Good evening Socialites. The K.D. Express and KTVO-3 have been reporting more details about the circumstances surrounding the charges filed against Nathaniel and Elisabeth Burns and Aaron Rodgerson:
“The allegations in that case are that the child at 10 months old only weighed 12 pounds, and City Councilman Rodgerson was giving some advice to these people regarding contact with the Kirksville Police Department and the family services,” Williams said.
The indictment alleges Rodgerson told the child’s parents not to cooperate with authorities and family services regarding the malnourished child.”
Specifically, that “practicing law without a license” charge stems from an incident described by Deputy Chief Tim King in the court documents as following:
“Once authorities responded to the call, the documents state Rodgerson told the mother and Deputy Chief Tim King that officers could not come into the mother’s home or inspect the child, as that would be a violation of her ‘6th Amendment rights’ and ‘that we (law enforcement) used the law to protect the child and violate the rights of the adult.’”
Rodgerson has made a brief statement about the nature of the charges, saying:
“‘All I’m willing to say at this time is that these charges are groundless,’ Rodgerson said by phone Saturday morning, ‘and we are cooperating and working with the local system of justice.’” (Please click on the link to see additional, non-charge oriented comments made by Rodgerson.)
I’d like to acknowledge that I’m not a Rodgerson devotee, something which, I expect, doesn’t come as a shock to anyone. One thing I do commend him for, however, is his desire to go beyond the role of citizen and to put himself in a position of accountability through which he tries to serve 17,000+ to the best of his capacities. You do that in this town (in any town, really) and you don’t exactly sign yourself up for an adoring fan base or anonymity. I also commend him for wanting to spend his life serving individuals in an additional capacity, and if the response of some of his parishoners to this mess is any indication of his pastoring style then I think they feel he probably does a pretty decent job for their church.
I’ve strongly disagreed with his inclination to use a religion to shape the law for a group of people who hold widely varying views, religious or otherwise, and I stand by that. Though I’ve found that some of the religiously-based decisions he’s made on City Council have led me to seriously question the quality of his judgment, and though I’m not particularly thrilled to hear that a City Councilman/Pastor stands accused of a charge that’s not tossed about lightly (more about that other, “practicing law without a license,” bit later) I can honestly say that it would make me incredibly happy to be able to report that the impetus for this entire situation was an unimaginably unfortunate series of misinterpreted circumstances. I can’t think of anyone who would wish otherwise, particularly for the child’s sake but also for Rodgerson’s and the Burns’.
A common thread throughout the dialogue is the inclusion of more facts. That’s fair, so let’s have at a few of the many discussions being had about this with as many facts as we can:
Argument: Weighing 12 pounds at 10 months does/does not constitute malnourishment.
Facts: Every child is immeasurably unique, and it could very well be that this child simply has a very slow rate of weight gain. Making the point that 10-monthers usually weigh a bit more than 12 pounds is also a valid argument.
A few people mentioned that WHO healthy baby standards rely on formula-fed babies for statistics, whose rates of growth are different from breastfed babies. The WHO actually revised their charts in 2006 to reflect healthy breastfed babies (data for girls here and boys here; note that these measurements are in kilograms and that 1 kg is the equivalent to 2.2 pounds). By way of comparison here’s the CDC’s most recent chart trends for breastfed babies, with pounds on the right. I’m sure I don’t need to whip out my Methodology notes and wax on about sample data and outliers and how statistics don’t speak for everyone under the sun.
Also, a few people have made mention of medical records, which haven’t been released for public consumption. I’ve fielded a few emails from people asking me about what information the records contain; the best I can do is say is that private medical records remain private unless they’re made public by the family or brought as evidence in a court case, neither of which has happened.
Argument: Kirksville/Missouri/DFS has overstepped its authority.
Facts: People abuse children. Consequently, laws have been developed to react against those seen to be comprimising the welfare of their children, and various entities have been charged with carrying out the enforcement of these laws in one capacity or another. If you belong to one of these agencies and honestly believe that there is a 10 month-old being abused in some manner you’re probably going pursue and/or arrest the person you feel confident is abusing them.
You’re also probably going to slap whatever charges you possibly can on them to try to nail them on something, or at least make them plea bargain. (Hence that “practicing law without a license” charge, methinks. Kind of seems like it was tossed in to be a bargaining chip.)
Argument: This is proof that Rodgerson is not “Christ-like.”
Facts: No stigmata on this blogger, and likely none on the people using this line, either.
Argument: The parties arrested were targeted by the law because they were Christian, because they spoke out against homosexuality and/or alcoholism, or because there’s a plot against them for the aforementioned reasons.
Facts: The parties were targeted by the law because the legal entities that deal with abuse in this city/state felt that they had enough evidence to prove that the 10 month-old was being endangered by each one of them. Are the individuals getting maligned for being hypocritical Christians? Yes, (see the “Facts” response from the previous question for my response to this) but not by the KPD or MO DFS. Speaking of those two entities, I’m not sure that either spoke out against Rodgerson’s Kirksville housing ordinance comments, or the Burns’ testamony about why the sale of alcohol in a public park would be a bad thing for families, or against all of them for loving Jesus. If there exists evidence to the contrary I’d love to post it.
Alright, Socialites, until more new info about this is released I’m through posting on it. Digress as you will.
Cheers,
Casey